Aruba vs Finland: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Aruba
0.9%
in 2021
Finland
0.4%
in 2021
Aruba rank
19th
Finland rank
22nd
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Aruba
- Finland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.9% against 0.4% in Finland, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.0 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 19th and Finland ranks 22nd of 57 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 0.1% | 1.0% | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.8% | 0.3% | 1.5% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Aruba or Finland?
- Aruba, at 0.9% against 0.4% in Finland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Aruba and Finland?
- 0.5%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Finland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Finland rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Aruba ranks 19th and Finland ranks 22nd of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.