Aruba vs Bulgaria: Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked
Aruba
0.9%
in 2021
Bulgaria
0.8%
in 2021
Aruba rank
19th
Bulgaria rank
20th
Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked over time
- Aruba
- Bulgaria
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.9% against 0.8% in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 19th and Bulgaria ranks 20th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Bulgaria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Bulgaria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 3.1% | 2.0% | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked, Aruba or Bulgaria?
- Aruba, at 0.9% against 0.8% in Bulgaria as of 2021.
- What is the difference in proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked between Aruba and Bulgaria?
- 0.1%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bulgaria?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Bulgaria rank globally for proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked?
- Aruba ranks 19th and Bulgaria ranks 20th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Proportion of traded wildlife that was poached or illicitly trafficked. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.