Sub-Saharan Africa vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Sub-Saharan Africa
1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
38th
Sweden rank
39th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Sweden
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 220,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 136.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 122.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,434 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 173.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 28,165 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,992 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 377.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 101,336 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100,959 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 844.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 140,495 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 139,650 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 1,327 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 180,211 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 178,885 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Sub-Saharan Africa or Sweden?
Sweden, at 222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Sub-Saharan Africa and Sweden?
220,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Sweden?
40 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Sweden rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/sweden/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.