OECD members vs Singapore: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

OECD members
156,714 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
236.37 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
5th
Singapore rank
3rd

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • OECD members
  • Singapore
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M197219972023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 236.37 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156,714 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 236.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1,508.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 47 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 8,853 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.69 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 18,818 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 14.72 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 62,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45.58 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45.51 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 95,719 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113.83 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 113.74 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 122,001 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 210.85 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 210.73 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, OECD members or Singapore?
Singapore, at 236.37 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156,714 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between OECD members and Singapore?
236.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Singapore rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
OECD members ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Singapore: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/">OECD members vs Singapore: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.