Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Malta
105.83 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend
181,674 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
5th
Post-demographic dividend rank
4th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Malta
  • Post-demographic dividend
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M197119972023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 105.83 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 181,674 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 105.65 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 582.5 times Post-demographic dividend's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 4th of 197 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 1.41 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 23,732 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.39 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 15.66 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72,081 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15.59 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 53.00 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 112,587 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 52.89 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 91.33 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 144,083 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 91.19 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Malta or Post-demographic dividend?
Malta, at 105.83 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 181,674 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Post-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Malta and Post-demographic dividend?
105.65 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Post-demographic dividend?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Malta and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Malta ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 4th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/post-demographic-dividend/">Malta vs Post-demographic dividend: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.