IDA blend vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

IDA blend
2,164 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend rank
36th
Sweden rank
39th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA blend
  • Sweden
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,164 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 220,244 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 102.8 times IDA blend's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

IDA blend ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA blend Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 116.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,257 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,141 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 152.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,982 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 132.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,774 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,641 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 637.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 101,336 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100,699 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 1,454 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 140,495 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 139,041 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 1,588 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 180,211 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 178,623 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, IDA blend or Sweden?
Sweden, at 222,408 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,164 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between IDA blend and Sweden?
220,244 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Sweden?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do IDA blend and Sweden rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
IDA blend ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA blend vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-blend/sweden/">IDA blend vs Sweden: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.