Hungary vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Hungary
332,337 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
35th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
38th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198220022023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 332,337 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 330,707 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 203.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th of 197 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 2,225 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,103 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 8,989 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 173.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,816 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 78,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 377.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 78,057 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 170,499 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 844.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 169,654 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 240,590 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,327 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 239,263 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Hungary or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Hungary, at 332,337 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,630 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Hungary and Sub-Saharan Africa?
330,707 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sub-Saharan Africa?
40 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 35th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 38th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hungary/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hungary/sub-saharan-africa/">Hungary vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.