Guatemala vs Lesotho: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
19,017 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
95th
Lesotho rank
93rd

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Lesotho
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197519992023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 19,017 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 941 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 93rd of 197 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 693.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,301 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,608 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 413.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,950 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,537 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 564.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 32,236 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 31,671 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 3,146 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,653 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18,508 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 5,899 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,461 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,561 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 12,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,738 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 19,017 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Lesotho?
941 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lesotho?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Lesotho rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 95th and Lesotho ranks 93rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Lesotho: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/lesotho/">Guatemala vs Lesotho: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.