Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
7,429 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
122nd
Sri Lanka rank
121st

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sri Lanka
05.0k10.0k15.0k197419982023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 7,429 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 121st of 197 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 1,193 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 263.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 929.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 4,732 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 916.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,815 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 9,904 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,366 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,538 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 11,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,937 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,518 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 9,980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,443 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 6,833 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,629 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 7,429 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sri Lanka rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Sri Lanka ranks 121st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/sri-lanka/">Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.