Colombia vs Eswatini: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Colombia
8,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
120th
Eswatini rank
122nd

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k196819952023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 8,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Eswatini ahead.

Colombia ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 122nd of 197 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 122.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,037 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 914.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 289.72 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,732 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 598.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,904 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,306 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 1,073 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,382 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 4,083 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,897 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 5,952 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,833 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 881.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Colombia or Eswatini?
Colombia, at 8,078 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,405 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Colombia and Eswatini?
673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Eswatini?
50 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Eswatini rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 122nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Eswatini: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/eswatini/">Colombia vs Eswatini: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.