Chile vs Guatemala: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
16,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
98th
Guatemala rank
95th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Guatemala
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197519992023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Guatemala ahead.

Chile ranks 98th and Guatemala ranks 95th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Guatemala Difference Ahead
1970s 83.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 693.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 609.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 401.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 413.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 1,031 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 564.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 465.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3,738 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,146 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 592.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 10,177 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,899 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,277 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 13,987 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,417 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 18,076 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Guatemala?
1,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guatemala?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Chile and Guatemala rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 98th and Guatemala ranks 95th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Guatemala: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/guatemala/">Chile vs Guatemala: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.