Brazil vs Tunisia: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
3,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
4,427 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
130th
Tunisia rank
127th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tunisia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k197519992023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 4,427 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 649 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Tunisia ahead.

Brazil ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 78.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 102.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 137.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 439.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 302.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 361.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 540.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 178.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 765.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,964 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,198 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 1,764 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,180 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,416 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 3,673 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,429 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 243.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 4,427 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Tunisia?
649 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 130th and Tunisia ranks 127th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tunisia: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tunisia/">Brazil vs Tunisia: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.