Botswana vs Tanzania: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
400.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
340 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
171st
Tanzania rank
173rd

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Tanzania
02505007501.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 400.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 340 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 60.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 171st and Tanzania ranks 173rd of 197 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 114.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 230.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 223.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 862.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 31.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 830.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 701.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 101.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 600.39 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 458.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 161.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 297.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 291.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 197.23 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 94.67 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Tanzania?
Botswana, at 400.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 340 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Tanzania?
60.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tanzania?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Tanzania rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 171st and Tanzania ranks 173rd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Tanzania: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/tanzania/">Botswana vs Tanzania: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.