Barbados vs United States: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
170,066 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
United States
149,032 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
47th
United States rank
49th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • United States
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196719952023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 170,066 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 149,032 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 21,034 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times United States's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 47th and United States ranks 49th of 197 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados United States Difference Ahead
1970s 26,046 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,085 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,961 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 83,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,276 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 72,265 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 139,012 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,000 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 117,012 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 341,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 57,434 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 284,333 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 548,119 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 90,756 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 457,363 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or United States?
Barbados, at 170,066 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 149,032 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in United States as of 2017.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and United States?
21,034 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and United States?
48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Barbados and United States rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 47th and United States ranks 49th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs United States: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/united-states/">Barbados vs United States: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.