Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
9,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde
9,660 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
114th
Cape Verde rank
113th

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Cape Verde
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k197619992023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 9,660 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 9,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 124 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 114th and Cape Verde ranks 113th of 197 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Cape Verde Difference Ahead
1970s 321.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 343.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 395.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 807.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 411.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 888.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,073 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 184.09 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 873.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,179 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,306 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 1,209 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,077 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,868 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 4,268 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,650 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Cape Verde?
Cape Verde, at 9,660 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 9,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
124 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cape Verde?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Cape Verde rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 114th and Cape Verde ranks 113th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cabo-verde/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/cabo-verde/">Bangladesh vs Cape Verde: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 8,921 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.