Curacao vs Eswatini: Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Curacao
- Eswatini
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 162.21 million BoP, current US$ against 145.33 million BoP, current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 16.89 million BoP, current US$.
That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 145th and Eswatini ranks 148th of 199 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 145.31 million BoP, current US$ | 167.11 million BoP, current US$ | 21.80 million BoP, current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 175.68 million BoP, current US$ | 117.53 million BoP, current US$ | 58.15 million BoP, current US$ | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary income receipts (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Curacao or Eswatini?
- Curacao, at 162.21 million BoP, current US$ against 145.33 million BoP, current US$ in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in primary income receipts (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Curacao and Eswatini?
- 16.89 million BoP, current US$, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Curacao and Eswatini rank globally for primary income receipts (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Curacao ranks 145th and Eswatini ranks 148th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$) with 56 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.