Guatemala vs India: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
36,099 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India
28,736 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
87th
India rank
90th

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • India
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197519992023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 36,099 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,736 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 7,363 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times India's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 87th and India ranks 90th of 198 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala India Difference Ahead
1970s 821.2 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 157.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 664.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 1,796 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 441.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,355 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 2,155 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,570 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 585.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 7,543 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,286 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,256 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 18,436 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,871 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,565 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 30,183 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22,728 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or India?
Guatemala, at 36,099 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 28,736 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and India?
7,363 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and India rank globally for primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 87th and India ranks 90th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs India: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/india/">Guatemala vs India: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,137 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.