Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
1,244 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1,143 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
177th
Zimbabwe rank
179th

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1,244 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,143 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 101 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Botswana ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 113.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 282.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 169.45 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 433.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 564.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 130.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 736.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 761.65 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 943.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 350.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 592.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 1,849 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 821.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,028 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 1,160 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,432 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 272.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 1,244 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,143 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
101 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 179th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,137 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.