Aruba vs United Kingdom: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
2.55 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
2.36 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
17th
United Kingdom rank
18th

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • United Kingdom
01.0M2.0M3.0M197019962023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 2.55 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2.36 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in United Kingdom, a difference of 192,620 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Aruba ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 18th of 198 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1980s 121,431 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 369,761 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 248,330 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 184,159 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 572,797 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 388,638 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 1.14 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.41 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 275,626 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 1.16 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.21 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 52,960 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom
2020s 1.38 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 140,054 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or United Kingdom?
Aruba, at 2.55 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2.36 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and United Kingdom?
192,620 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and United Kingdom?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Aruba and United Kingdom rank globally for primary income payments (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 17th and United Kingdom ranks 18th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs United Kingdom: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-income-payments-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/united-kingdom/">Aruba vs United Kingdom: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 9,137 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Primary income payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.