Kazakhstan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per capita
Kazakhstan
1,298 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
1,208 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2018
Kazakhstan rank
63rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
65th
Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 1,298 BoP, current US$ per person against 1,208 BoP, current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 90 BoP, current US$ per person.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 200 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher primary income payments (bop, current us$), per capita, Kazakhstan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Kazakhstan, at 1,298 BoP, current US$ per person against 1,208 BoP, current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in primary income payments (bop, current us$), per capita between Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 90 BoP, current US$ per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Kazakhstan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for primary income payments (bop, current us$), per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 65th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Primary income payments (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Primary income payments (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.