Southern Asia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report)
Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report) over time
- Southern Asia
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 73 % against 39 % in Southern Asia, a difference of 34 %.
That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.9 times Southern Asia's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Southern Asia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 34 groups.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Asia | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 54.9 % | 74.1 % | 19.2 % | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | 47.17 % | 73.53 % | 26.37 % | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026, Southern Asia or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 73 % against 39 % in Southern Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026 between Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 34 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Southern Asia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for prevalence of unaffordability (pua) — value — july 2026?
- Southern Asia ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 16th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of unaffordability (PUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicators on the cost and affordability of a healthy diet (CoAHD) are estimated in each country and show the population’s physical and economic access to least expensive locally available foods to meet requirements for a healthy diet, as defined in food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). The indicators use observed retail food consumer prices and income distributions to provide an operational measure of people’s access to locally available foods in the proportions needed for health. These indicators support efforts within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030 (SDG 2). They also support the monitoring of progress towards the objective of transforming agrifood systems by promoting “nutrition-sensitive agriculture”. FAO, in partnership with the Food Price for Nutrition of the World Bank, produces and reports the CoAHD indicators.