Panama vs Slovak Republic: Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no
Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no over time
- Panama
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Panama currently reports 25.5 % against 25.3 % in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.2 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 98th and Slovak Republic ranks 100th of 196 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.95 % | 21.45 % | 6.5 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 22.86 % | 22.1 % | 0.76 % | Panama |
| 2020s | 24.45 % | 24.35 % | 0.1 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Panama or Slovak Republic?
- Panama, at 25.5 % against 25.3 % in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Panama and Slovak Republic?
- 0.2 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Slovak Republic?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Slovak Republic rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Panama ranks 98th and Slovak Republic ranks 100th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.