Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Middle Africa
41.7 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
38.8 %
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0204060200020112023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 41.7 % against 38.8 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.9 %.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.1 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 20 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 50.19 % 40.56 % 9.63 % Middle Africa
2010s 42.97 % 37.05 % 5.92 % Middle Africa
2020s 41.4 % 38.08 % 3.32 % Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 41.7 % against 38.8 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.9 %, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Middle Africa ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.