Micronesia (Federated States of) vs South-eastern Asia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Micronesia (Federated States of)
22.1 %
in 2023
South-eastern Asia
24.2 %
in 2023
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
18th
South-eastern Asia rank
21st

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time

  • Micronesia (Federated States of)
  • South-eastern Asia
0102030200020112023

How they compare

South-eastern Asia currently reports 24.2 % against 22.1 % in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 2.1 %.

That makes South-eastern Asia's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia (Federated States of)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, South-eastern Asia has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and South-eastern Asia ranks 21st of 20 countries.

South-eastern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (Federated States of) South-eastern Asia Difference Ahead
2000s 17.7 % 28.49 % 10.79 % South-eastern Asia
2010s 18.68 % 25.41 % 6.73 % South-eastern Asia
2020s 21.07 % 24.07 % 3 % South-eastern Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Micronesia (Federated States of) or South-eastern Asia?
South-eastern Asia, at 24.2 % against 22.1 % in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and South-eastern Asia?
2.1 %, with South-eastern Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and South-eastern Asia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and South-eastern Asia rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and South-eastern Asia ranks 21st of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs South-eastern Asia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/micronesia-federated-states-of/south-eastern-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/micronesia-federated-states-of/south-eastern-asia/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs South-eastern Asia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.