Melanesia vs Papua New Guinea: Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no
Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no over time
- Melanesia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 29.1 % against 28.8 % in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.3 %.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 76th and Papua New Guinea ranks 78th of 196 countries.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.83 % | 26.12 % | 0.71 % | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 26.15 % | 25.61 % | 0.54 % | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 28.18 % | 27.8 % | 0.375 % | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Melanesia or Papua New Guinea?
- Melanesia, at 29.1 % against 28.8 % in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Melanesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.3 %, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Melanesia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Melanesia ranks 76th and Papua New Guinea ranks 78th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.