Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
32.2 %
in 2023
Melanesia
29.1 %
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
11th
Melanesia rank
9th

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Melanesia
010203040200020112023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 32.2 % against 29.1 % in Melanesia, a difference of 3.1 %.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Melanesia ranks 9th of 37 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Melanesia Difference Ahead
2000s 32.73 % 26.83 % 5.9 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 29.61 % 26.15 % 3.46 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 31.27 % 28.18 % 3.1 % Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Melanesia?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 32.2 % against 29.1 % in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
3.1 %, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Melanesia rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th and Melanesia ranks 9th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/melanesia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Melanesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.