Europe vs Myanmar: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Europe
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 39.7 % against 18.6 % in Europe, a difference of 21.1 %.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 2.1 times Europe's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 27th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 37 groups.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.41 % | 40.82 % | 26.41 % | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 15.14 % | 35.62 % | 20.48 % | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 17.7 % | 38.05 % | 20.35 % | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Europe or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 39.7 % against 18.6 % in Europe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Europe and Myanmar?
- 21.1 %, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Myanmar?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Myanmar rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Europe ranks 27th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 37 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.