Estonia vs Micronesia: Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no
Prevalence of anemia: Value Female All age ranges or no over time
- Estonia
- Micronesia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 24.7 % against 24.5 % in Micronesia, a difference of 0.2 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Micronesia ahead.
Estonia ranks 106th and Micronesia ranks 109th of 196 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.69 % | 21.57 % | 0.88 % | Micronesia |
| 2010s | 21.45 % | 21.96 % | 0.51 % | Micronesia |
| 2020s | 23.8 % | 23.7 % | 0.1 % | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Estonia or Micronesia?
- Estonia, at 24.7 % against 24.5 % in Micronesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Estonia and Micronesia?
- 0.2 %, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Micronesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Micronesia rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Estonia ranks 106th and Micronesia ranks 109th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.