Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Polynesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
24.9 %
in 2023
Polynesia
21.6 %
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
16th
Polynesia rank
19th

Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Polynesia
0102030200020112023

How they compare

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) currently reports 24.9 % against 21.6 % in Polynesia, a difference of 3.3 %.

That makes Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s figure about 1.2 times Polynesia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 16th and Polynesia ranks 19th of 20 countries.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 26.59 % 19.32 % 7.27 % Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 25.24 % 19.02 % 6.22 % Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2020s 24.7 % 20.88 % 3.82 % Bolivia (Plurinational State of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Polynesia?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of), at 24.9 % against 21.6 % in Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Polynesia?
3.3 %, with Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Polynesia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Polynesia rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 16th and Polynesia ranks 19th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Polynesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/prevalence-of-anemia-among-women-of-reproductive-age-15-49-years-percent-value-female-all/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/polynesia/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Polynesia: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
234 places, 5,616 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.