Belgium vs Iceland: Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)
Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) over time
- Belgium
- Iceland
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 15 % against 14.7 % in Iceland, a difference of 0.3 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Belgium ranks 160th and Iceland ranks 162nd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.88 % | 10.96 % | 0.08 % | Iceland |
| 2010s | 11.7 % | 11.68 % | 0.02 % | Belgium |
| 2020s | 14.15 % | 13.88 % | 0.275 % | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years), Belgium or Iceland?
- Belgium, at 15 % against 14.7 % in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) between Belgium and Iceland?
- 0.3 %, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iceland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Iceland rank globally for prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years)?
- Belgium ranks 160th and Iceland ranks 162nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) (percent) — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.