Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Rwanda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 22.60 million BoP, current US$ against 18.57 million BoP, current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 4.03 million BoP, current US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -33.86 million BoP, current US$ | -20.35 million BoP, current US$ | 13.52 million BoP, current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -32.44 million BoP, current US$ | 65.69 million BoP, current US$ | 98.13 million BoP, current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 22.60 million BoP, current US$ against 18.57 million BoP, current US$ in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 4.03 million BoP, current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Rwanda ranks 95th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$) with 88 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.