Rwanda vs Tuvalu: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Rwanda
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 18.57 million BoP, current US$ against 10.26 million BoP, current US$ in Tuvalu, a difference of 8.31 million BoP, current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.8 times Tuvalu's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Rwanda ranks 95th and Tuvalu ranks 98th of 188 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -33.86 million BoP, current US$ | 9.87 million BoP, current US$ | 43.74 million BoP, current US$ | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | -45.19 million BoP, current US$ | 11.58 million BoP, current US$ | 56.78 million BoP, current US$ | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Rwanda or Tuvalu?
- Rwanda, at 18.57 million BoP, current US$ against 10.26 million BoP, current US$ in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Rwanda and Tuvalu?
- 8.31 million BoP, current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Tuvalu rank globally for portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Rwanda ranks 95th and Tuvalu ranks 98th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$) with 88 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.