Congo vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

Congo
34.28 million BoP, current US$
in 2021
Zimbabwe
22.60 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Congo rank
90th
Zimbabwe rank
93rd

Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
-200.0M-100.0M0100.0M197720002024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 34.28 million BoP, current US$ against 22.60 million BoP, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 11.68 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 21.22 million BoP, current US$ -67.00 million BoP, current US$ 88.22 million BoP, current US$ Congo
2010s -25.78 million BoP, current US$ -20.35 million BoP, current US$ 5.44 million BoP, current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s -75.20 million BoP, current US$ 94.68 million BoP, current US$ 169.88 million BoP, current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 34.28 million BoP, current US$ against 22.60 million BoP, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Congo and Zimbabwe?
11.68 million BoP, current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2021.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
Congo ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-investment-net-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,020 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$) with 88 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.