Congo vs New Caledonia: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Congo
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 51.99 million BoP, current US$ against 34.28 million BoP, current US$ in Congo, a difference of 17.71 million BoP, current US$.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.5 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.85 million BoP, current US$ | -81.23 million BoP, current US$ | 85.07 million BoP, current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 14.98 million BoP, current US$ | -19.41 million BoP, current US$ | 34.38 million BoP, current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Congo or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 51.99 million BoP, current US$ against 34.28 million BoP, current US$ in Congo as of 2016.
- What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Congo and New Caledonia?
- 17.71 million BoP, current US$, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and New Caledonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Congo and New Caledonia rank globally for portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 87th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$) with 88 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.