Andorra vs Serbia: Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Andorra
980.83 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Serbia
982.57 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Andorra rank
49th
Serbia rank
48th
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Andorra
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 982.57 million BoP, current US$ against 980.83 million BoP, current US$ in Andorra, a difference of 1.73 million BoP, current US$.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Andorra has been ahead every year.
Andorra ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 188 countries.
Andorra has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Andorra | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.76 million BoP, current US$ | -210.73 million BoP, current US$ | 304.49 million BoP, current US$ | Andorra |
| 2020s | 585.41 million BoP, current US$ | -1.00 billion BoP, current US$ | 1.59 billion BoP, current US$ | Andorra |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Andorra or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 982.57 million BoP, current US$ against 980.83 million BoP, current US$ in Andorra as of 2025.
- What is the difference in portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Andorra and Serbia?
- 1.73 million BoP, current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Andorra and Serbia rank globally for portfolio investment, net (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Andorra ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$) with 88 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.