Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

Europe & Central Asia
563.21 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Japan
57.42 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia rank
6th
Japan rank
4th

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Japan
0500.0B1.0T1.5T196719962025

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia currently reports 563.21 billion BoP, current US$ against 57.42 billion BoP, current US$ in Japan, a difference of 505.78 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia's figure about 9.8 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Europe & Central Asia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 6th and Japan ranks 4th of 47 groups.

Europe & Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 1.87 billion BoP, current US$ -420.00 million BoP, current US$ 2.29 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1980s 16.34 billion BoP, current US$ -2.86 billion BoP, current US$ 19.20 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia
1990s 84.19 billion BoP, current US$ 35.80 billion BoP, current US$ 48.39 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2000s 258.45 billion BoP, current US$ 39.81 billion BoP, current US$ 218.64 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2010s 502.98 billion BoP, current US$ 25.58 billion BoP, current US$ 477.40 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia
2020s 520.19 billion BoP, current US$ 4.34 billion BoP, current US$ 515.85 billion BoP, current US$ Europe & Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Europe & Central Asia or Japan?
Europe & Central Asia, at 563.21 billion BoP, current US$ against 57.42 billion BoP, current US$ in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Europe & Central Asia and Japan?
505.78 billion BoP, current US$, with Europe & Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Japan?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Japan rank globally for portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 6th and Japan ranks 4th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia/japan/">Europe & Central Asia vs Japan: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 9,052 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 121 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.