China vs Post-demographic dividend: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

China
35.76 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Post-demographic dividend
1.37 trillion BoP, current US$
in 2025
China rank
6th
Post-demographic dividend rank
3rd

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • Post-demographic dividend
0500.0B1.0T1.5T196019922025

How they compare

Post-demographic dividend currently reports 1.37 trillion BoP, current US$ against 35.76 billion BoP, current US$ in China, a difference of 1.33 trillion BoP, current US$.

That makes Post-demographic dividend's figure about 38.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.

China ranks 6th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 184 countries.

Post-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1980s 0 BoP, current US$ 23.78 billion BoP, current US$ 23.78 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
1990s 1.55 billion BoP, current US$ 155.42 billion BoP, current US$ 153.87 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2000s 14.82 billion BoP, current US$ 418.74 billion BoP, current US$ 403.93 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2010s 33.12 billion BoP, current US$ 430.56 billion BoP, current US$ 397.43 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2020s 39.33 billion BoP, current US$ 637.71 billion BoP, current US$ 598.38 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, China or Post-demographic dividend?
Post-demographic dividend, at 1.37 trillion BoP, current US$ against 35.76 billion BoP, current US$ in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between China and Post-demographic dividend?
1.33 trillion BoP, current US$, with Post-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Post-demographic dividend?
44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
How do China and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 6th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Post-demographic dividend: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/post-demographic-dividend/">China vs Post-demographic dividend: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 9,052 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 121 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.