Barbados vs Serbia: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time
- Barbados
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3.24 million BoP, current US$ against 2.58 million BoP, current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 661,610 BoP, current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Barbados ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.28 million BoP, current US$ | 244.19 million BoP, current US$ | 220.91 million BoP, current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 17.80 million BoP, current US$ | -5.39 million BoP, current US$ | 23.19 million BoP, current US$ | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Barbados or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3.24 million BoP, current US$ against 2.58 million BoP, current US$ in Barbados as of 2025.
- What is the difference in portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Barbados and Serbia?
- 661,610 BoP, current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Serbia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2017.
- How do Barbados and Serbia rank globally for portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
- Barbados ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 75th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 121 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.