Australia vs North America: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

Australia
18.75 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
North America
722.69 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Australia rank
8th
North America rank
5th

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Australia
  • North America
-250.0B0250.0B500.0B750.0B196019922025

How they compare

North America currently reports 722.69 billion BoP, current US$ against 18.75 billion BoP, current US$ in Australia, a difference of 703.94 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes North America's figure about 38.5 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 8th and North America ranks 5th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and North America in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia North America Difference Ahead
1960s 181.44 million BoP, current US$ -22.28 million BoP, current US$ 203.72 million BoP, current US$ Australia
1970s 165.58 million BoP, current US$ 1.44 billion BoP, current US$ 1.27 billion BoP, current US$ North America
1980s 1.14 billion BoP, current US$ 7.06 billion BoP, current US$ 5.92 billion BoP, current US$ North America
1990s 5.62 billion BoP, current US$ 30.02 billion BoP, current US$ 24.40 billion BoP, current US$ North America
2000s 8.73 billion BoP, current US$ 138.63 billion BoP, current US$ 129.90 billion BoP, current US$ North America
2010s 11.32 billion BoP, current US$ 51.13 billion BoP, current US$ 39.81 billion BoP, current US$ North America
2020s 16.73 billion BoP, current US$ 281.13 billion BoP, current US$ 264.41 billion BoP, current US$ North America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Australia or North America?
North America, at 722.69 billion BoP, current US$ against 18.75 billion BoP, current US$ in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Australia and North America?
703.94 billion BoP, current US$, with North America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and North America?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Australia and North America rank globally for portfolio equity, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
Australia ranks 8th and North America ranks 5th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs North America: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/australia/north-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/portfolio-equity-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/australia/north-america/">Australia vs North America: Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 9,052 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 121 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.