Chile vs Rwanda: Plums and sloes — Producer Price
Plums and sloes — Producer Price over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.01 million LCU against 763,208 LCU in Chile, a difference of 245,862 LCU.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 65 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher plums and sloes — producer price, Chile or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1.01 million LCU against 763,208 LCU in Chile as of 2015.
- What is the difference in plums and sloes — producer price between Chile and Rwanda?
- 245,862 LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for plums and sloes — producer price?
- Chile ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 65 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Plums and sloes — Producer Price (LCU/tonne). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.