Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Serbia
64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
2,043 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
35th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Serbia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k200420132023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,043 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 62,268 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 31.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Serbia ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 174 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 43,598 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,179 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 42,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 41,052 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,598 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 39,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 55,131 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,840 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 53,292 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Serbia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Serbia, at 64,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,043 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
62,268 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Serbia ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/serbia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/serbia/sub-saharan-africa/">Serbia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.