Gambia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Gambia
49,772 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
38th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
38th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Gambia
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
020.0k40.0k60.0k200320132023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 49,772 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 47,734 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 24.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 38th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 174 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
2000s 5,879 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 502.84 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,376 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 14,309 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,093 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,216 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 48,106 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,746 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 46,361 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Gambia or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Gambia, at 49,772 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,038 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Gambia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
47,734 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Gambia ranks 38th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Gambia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.