Egypt vs Tunisia: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
19,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
15,865 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
64th
Tunisia rank
67th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Tunisia
010.0k20.0k30.0k197619992023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 19,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,865 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 3,756 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Tunisia ahead.

Egypt ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 174 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 1,646 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,441 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 204.19 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 3,147 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,415 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 732.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 4,060 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,030 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29.37 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 4,903 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,053 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 19,827 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,607 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,220 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 27,363 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,111 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,253 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or Tunisia?
Egypt, at 19,621 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,865 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and Tunisia?
3,756 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Tunisia?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Tunisia rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Tunisia: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/tunisia/">Egypt vs Tunisia: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.