China vs Iceland: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

China
660.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Iceland
673.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
144th
Iceland rank
143rd

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Iceland
0200400600800198220022023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 673.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 660.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 13.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iceland ahead.

China ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 174 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 150.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 102.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 48.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 236.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 111.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 124.93 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 701.62 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 444.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 257.41 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, China or Iceland?
Iceland, at 673.94 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 660.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between China and Iceland?
13.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2018.
How do China and Iceland rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Iceland: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/iceland/">China vs Iceland: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.