Cape Verde vs Least developed countries: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Cape Verde
74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
2,762 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
30th
Least developed countries rank
31st

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Least developed countries
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197720002023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,762 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 71,623 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 26.9 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 30th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 174 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 34,745 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 907.9 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 33,837 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 45,885 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,806 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44,080 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 69,647 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 67,110 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Least developed countries?
Cape Verde, at 74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,762 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Least developed countries?
71,623 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Least developed countries?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Least developed countries rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 30th and Least developed countries ranks 31st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Least developed countries: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Cape Verde vs Least developed countries: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.