Cape Verde vs South Korea: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Cape Verde
74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea
65,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
30th
South Korea rank
32nd

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • South Korea
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197720002023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 65,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea, a difference of 9,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 30th and South Korea ranks 32nd of 174 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde South Korea Difference Ahead
1980s 7,591 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,228 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,637 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 19,210 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,776 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 29,140 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 48,871 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,731 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 45,885 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 59,719 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,833 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 69,647 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 69,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 191.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Cape Verde or South Korea?
Cape Verde, at 74,385 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 65,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Cape Verde and South Korea?
9,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Korea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and South Korea rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 30th and South Korea ranks 32nd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs South Korea: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/korea-rep/">Cape Verde vs South Korea: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.