Brazil vs Niger: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Brazil
478.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
423.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
149th
Niger rank
151st

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Niger
0200400600197419982023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 478.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 423.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Niger, a difference of 54.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Niger ahead.

Brazil ranks 149th and Niger ranks 151st of 174 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Niger in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Niger Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5982 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1980s 4.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Niger
1990s 175.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 167.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 260.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 234.47 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 288.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 101.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 186.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 474.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 365.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 109.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Niger?
Brazil, at 478.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 423.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Niger?
54.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Niger?
44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Niger rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 149th and Niger ranks 151st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Niger: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/niger/">Brazil vs Niger: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.