Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Sao Tome and Principe
95,130 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
24th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197820002023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 95,130 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 6,016 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 24th of 174 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 44,837 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 223.03 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44,614 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 123,954 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 510.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 123,443 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 183,321 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,545 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 181,776 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 222,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 206,536 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 95,130 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
6,016 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2017.
How do Barbados and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 26th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 24th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/sao-tome-and-principe/">Barbados vs Sao Tome and Principe: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.