Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Barbados
89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
3,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
26th
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
27th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k198120022023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 85,552 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 25.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 26th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 27th of 174 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 147,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,432 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 145,650 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 222,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,234 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 220,722 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Barbados or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
Barbados, at 89,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,562 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2017.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
85,552 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
How do Barbados and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 26th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 27th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/">Barbados vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.