Bangladesh vs Guatemala: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
168,931 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
184,968 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
13th
Guatemala rank
11th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Guatemala
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197619992023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 184,968 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 168,931 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 16,037 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 13th and Guatemala ranks 11th of 174 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Guatemala Difference Ahead
1980s 5,845 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 519.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,325 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 9,285 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,765 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,520 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 37,918 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,928 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,990 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 109,065 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 61,816 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 47,249 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 167,438 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 150,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17,018 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 184,968 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 168,931 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Guatemala?
16,037 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Guatemala?
36 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Guatemala rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 13th and Guatemala ranks 11th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Guatemala: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/guatemala/">Bangladesh vs Guatemala: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.